Patriarchy
Patriarchy #
Humans have a uniquely unequal gender relationship #
- Men historically had most power, and were able to keep it
- Men particularly interested in controlling female sexuality and reproduction
- Evolutionary success results from dual inheritance
- Material wealth inequality drives male control
In leadership: #
- Implicit bias — women judged as less competetive, independent (no evidence in practice of performance difference)
- Female leaders are more egalitarian and democratic
- Women have more power in egalitarian societies (Chimani)
- Major role in mediating conflict
- Increased wealth → increased gender equality
- Women have more power in egalitarian societies (Chimani)
Male Aggression is Cultural #
- Yanomamo (Amazonia): hunting society w/ lethal fighting
- Violent female coercion
- No paternal childcare
- Polygyny
- Aké (West Africa): foraging society
- No male-female aggression
- Monogamy
- Highest levels of paternal care
— Evidence for dual inheritance theory: gender differences depend on culture
Mammalian Leadership #
Gorillas #
- Single male w/ several females
- Male defends groups from other males
- If defeated, infanticide occurs
Chimps #
- Multiple related males (brothers)
- Strong male alliances
- Aggression v/ other groups, incl. females
- Females mate w/ all males
- Population differences: some aggression in forced mating
Baboons #
- Very independent: single male w/ multiple females
- Variations: some let females be independent, others are very controlling (hamadryas baboon)
- Olive baboon: females form alliances to protect themselves, counteract body size differences
In other social species: #
- distributed leadership (multiple leaders)
- attribute based leadership (sex, age, personality, social status…)
- multiple roles
- group travel initiator (adult females w/ knowledge of feeding areas)
- forager / hunt leader
- conflict resolver
Very few species have a single female dominant to single male, but many leadership roles given to females
Killer Whales #
- grandmothers / alloparents
- matrilineal social structures
- pods consist of multiple matrilines (up to 4 generations)
- menopausal females lead hunts, train sons
African Lion #
- only social cats
- females are philopatric — stay w/ family, while males disperse
- matrilineal
- lionesses coordinate hunt
- conflict within pride is rare
Elephants #
- females are philopatric
- similar social org to whales (multiple related matrilines)
- fission-fusion: join / break up of individual matrilines
- oldest female (matriarch) leads group movement
Spotted Hyena #
- specialized to eat bones
- females are larger than males
- females dominant to single male
Bonobo #
- “make love not war”
- males are philopatric (females have power, males disperse)
- female-biased leadership
- rare between-group conflict resolved by both sexes
- unrelated females form alliances to maintain egalitarian society
Why are female alliances only in bonobos? #
- very rich ecology
- less competition to acquire resources
- no competitors west of Congo river
- gorillas, chimps fight for resources and have wealth differences
Patriarchy: How (6 factors) #
Reduction in female allies #
- females disperse from kin
- no alliances b/tw non-kin females (Bonobo only)
- solitary females prone to male coercion
- → strengthen female alliances
Elaboration of male alliances #
- purpose: control and accumulate wealth
- in chimps: high degree of relatedness, most elaborate male alliances
- functions:
- organize hunts, raids
- → strengthen institutional protection of women
Increased male control of resources #
- more food → more male control
- increased reliance on cumulative culture, cooperative hunting, breeding
- ↳ rise of gendered labor: males hunt, females forage
- females more dependent on males to provide for altricial babies
- feedback loop: dependence ↔ power
- ↳ rise of gendered labor: males hunt, females forage
- → increase female economic independence
Increased hierarchy formation #
- unequal relationships among men (allowed by material wealth)
- wealth used to increase reproductive success of most powerful men
- ↳ allow additional control of women
- ↳ demanded higher paternity certainty (want to know children are theirs): additional control over bodies
- → decrease economic/power inequality
Females enforce male control #
- to increase reproductive success, must follow the norm
- once patriarchal system was set in place, female alliances no longer increased reproductive success
- ↳ example: favor sons due to higher potential in hierarchy
- ↳ daughters have chance of marrying wealthy man
- → change female behaviors that support patriarchy
Evolution of language and ideology #
- ideologies invented to maintain patriarchy (ex. men are born virtuous…)
- Bible, others used as guide on how to behave in presence of material wealth
- → change ideologies
Human Leadership #
Why are females underrepresented in human leadership?
Phylogeny #
- ↳ sex differences are a product of sexual selection
- ↳ in other species, matrilines, alliances exist
Function #
- ↳ sex differences in leadership
- leader starts hunt, but dominant individual gets best share
- ↳ males, females benefit differently from leadership
Bateman-Trivers Paradigm #
- female cost per offspring is higher
- males have higher potential reproductive rate
- operational sex ratio: more males available, must physically compete for access to females
- female need: parental investment from males
What limits reproduction? #
- females: resources for offspring, safety
- males: access to females
→ result: female leadership focuses on leading group to food/resources, foraging decisions (bonobo, zebra, lemurs…)
male leadership protects fertile females
- leads to intergroup conflict
- intragroup conflicts to increase rank in group, increase mating
Costs of leadership #
- predation (first to enter area)
- retaliation
- injury: females more risk-adverse → less benefit to lead
- loss of reputation on failure
- opportunity costs
Sexual Selection of Leadership #
- males: leadership status predicts reproductive success
- females: desire leadership positions that improve child survival
sexual selection influences cultural transmission but does not determine or justify behavior
Five implications of policy #
encouragement of women to act like men is ineffective
- different goals
- more democratic leadership in women
call attention to poor male strategy
- self promotion, overconfidence, exaggerating competence
- large social networks with weak ties
- toxic competitive practice
emphasize other motivations for leadership
- prestige over power of norms, dominance
- institutional requirements for gender diversity
make work compatible with childcare
- remove gendered labor
- increase paternity leave (reduced testosterone → change behaviors)
diversify leadership styles
- some situations need covert, empathetic competition
- prioritization of healthcare, welfare, education (success of offspring)
Competition Differences Between Sexes #
WEIRD Men: #
- fast, large scale coalition building
- larger group socializing
- hierarchies
- respect competitiveness
- structure to compete against other groups of men
WEIRD Women: #
- Competition modes are low injury risk
- indirect aggression: gossip, social exclusion
- Seek stable sources of social support
- levelling mechanism to counter aggressive individuals
- egalitarian small networks
- less political influence (smaller, closer alliances)
Competitive Styles #
- men: contest competition (public, zero-sum, rituals)
- women: scramble competition (everyone competes against themselves, adaptive to alloparenting)
Leadership #
- followers prefer physically dominant leaders over prestige-based traits
The Precarious Manhood Belief #
- manhood is hard to earn, easy to lose, must be proven repeatedly by action
- more prevalent in less developed countries: less material wealth ⇒ more relational wealth
- correlated w/ gender inequality
- fear of paternity uncertainty ⇒ high homicide rate of intimate partners
In typical polygynous mammals: #
- males “run for office” by visiting fertile females in her territory
- evidence for episodic memory
- compete w/ other males to see who can navigate most accurately
- females choose males based on familiarity
- good genes: offspring will have good spatial ability
→ polygynous males have better maze solving ability → no diff. in monogamous (territories overlap)
- Sex differences in space use predict hippocampus differences
males → females → food (low res map of large space) (high res map of small space)
In humans: #
- males are better at mental object rotation
- recognition of distant landmarks
- females are better at relative object position memory
- track locations of food plants
- more valuable foods are remembered more (SB farmers market experiment)
Twe Tribe (Namibia): #
- both sexes forage, men take longer trips to find honey
- men visit other camps more (politics, mating, alliances) → foraging for mating opportunities
- result: men outperformed women in all memory tasks
- WEIRD female advantage not present
Yucatec Maya: #
- highly monogamous
- sex difference in mobility only exists after marriage because men increase travel, travel alone
Tsimane Tribe: (Bolivia) #
Gender differences in distance traveled
- childhood, after marriage: no difference
- adolescence: males travel further to find mates
- overall, no difference found in spatial cognition
- richer, more schooling → better mental rotation, poorer pointing accuracy
Mobility is a signal of status in historical societies #
- wealthy restricted mobility w/ heels to show they didn’t need to walk
- foot binding → increases
Human: