ben's notes

Patriarchy

Your browser does not support inline PDFs. Download the PDF instead.

Patriarchy #

Humans have a uniquely unequal gender relationship #

  • Men historically had most power, and were able to keep it
  • Men particularly interested in controlling female sexuality and reproduction
  • Evolutionary success results from dual inheritance
  • Material wealth inequality drives male control

In leadership: #

  • Implicit bias — women judged as less competetive, independent (no evidence in practice of performance difference)
  • Female leaders are more egalitarian and democratic
    • Women have more power in egalitarian societies (Chimani)
      • Major role in mediating conflict
    • Increased wealth → increased gender equality

Male Aggression is Cultural #

  • Yanomamo (Amazonia): hunting society w/ lethal fighting
    • Violent female coercion
    • No paternal childcare
    • Polygyny
  • Aké (West Africa): foraging society
    • No male-female aggression
    • Monogamy
    • Highest levels of paternal care

— Evidence for dual inheritance theory: gender differences depend on culture

Mammalian Leadership #

Gorillas #

  • Single male w/ several females
  • Male defends groups from other males
  • If defeated, infanticide occurs

Chimps #

  • Multiple related males (brothers)
  • Strong male alliances
  • Aggression v/ other groups, incl. females
  • Females mate w/ all males
    • Population differences: some aggression in forced mating

Baboons #

  • Very independent: single male w/ multiple females
  • Variations: some let females be independent, others are very controlling (hamadryas baboon)
    • Olive baboon: females form alliances to protect themselves, counteract body size differences

In other social species: #

  • distributed leadership (multiple leaders)
  • attribute based leadership (sex, age, personality, social status…)
  • multiple roles
    • group travel initiator (adult females w/ knowledge of feeding areas)
    • forager / hunt leader
    • conflict resolver

Very few species have a single female dominant to single male, but many leadership roles given to females

Killer Whales #

  • grandmothers / alloparents
  • matrilineal social structures
    • pods consist of multiple matrilines (up to 4 generations)
  • menopausal females lead hunts, train sons

African Lion #

  • only social cats
  • females are philopatric — stay w/ family, while males disperse
    • matrilineal
    • lionesses coordinate hunt
    • conflict within pride is rare

Elephants #

  • females are philopatric
  • similar social org to whales (multiple related matrilines)
  • fission-fusion: join / break up of individual matrilines
  • oldest female (matriarch) leads group movement

Spotted Hyena #

  • specialized to eat bones
  • females are larger than males
  • females dominant to single male

Bonobo #

  • “make love not war”
  • males are philopatric (females have power, males disperse)
  • female-biased leadership
  • rare between-group conflict resolved by both sexes
  • unrelated females form alliances to maintain egalitarian society

Why are female alliances only in bonobos? #

  • very rich ecology
  • less competition to acquire resources
  • no competitors west of Congo river
  • gorillas, chimps fight for resources and have wealth differences

Patriarchy: How (6 factors) #

Reduction in female allies #

  • females disperse from kin
  • no alliances b/tw non-kin females (Bonobo only)
  • solitary females prone to male coercion
    • → strengthen female alliances

Elaboration of male alliances #

  • purpose: control and accumulate wealth
  • in chimps: high degree of relatedness, most elaborate male alliances
  • functions:
    • organize hunts, raids
    • → strengthen institutional protection of women

Increased male control of resources #

  • more food → more male control
  • increased reliance on cumulative culture, cooperative hunting, breeding
    • ↳ rise of gendered labor: males hunt, females forage
      • females more dependent on males to provide for altricial babies
      • feedback loop: dependence ↔ power
  • → increase female economic independence

Increased hierarchy formation #

  • unequal relationships among men (allowed by material wealth)
  • wealth used to increase reproductive success of most powerful men
    • ↳ allow additional control of women
    • ↳ demanded higher paternity certainty (want to know children are theirs): additional control over bodies
  • → decrease economic/power inequality

Females enforce male control #

  • to increase reproductive success, must follow the norm
  • once patriarchal system was set in place, female alliances no longer increased reproductive success
    • ↳ example: favor sons due to higher potential in hierarchy
    • ↳ daughters have chance of marrying wealthy man
  • → change female behaviors that support patriarchy

Evolution of language and ideology #

  • ideologies invented to maintain patriarchy (ex. men are born virtuous…)
  • Bible, others used as guide on how to behave in presence of material wealth
  • → change ideologies

Human Leadership #

Why are females underrepresented in human leadership?

Phylogeny #

  • ↳ sex differences are a product of sexual selection
  • ↳ in other species, matrilines, alliances exist

Function #

  • ↳ sex differences in leadership
    • leader starts hunt, but dominant individual gets best share
  • ↳ males, females benefit differently from leadership

Bateman-Trivers Paradigm #

  • female cost per offspring is higher
  • males have higher potential reproductive rate
  • operational sex ratio: more males available, must physically compete for access to females
  • female need: parental investment from males

What limits reproduction? #

  • females: resources for offspring, safety
  • males: access to females

→ result: female leadership focuses on leading group to food/resources, foraging decisions (bonobo, zebra, lemurs…)

male leadership protects fertile females

  • leads to intergroup conflict
  • intragroup conflicts to increase rank in group, increase mating

Costs of leadership #

  • predation (first to enter area)
  • retaliation
  • injury: females more risk-adverse → less benefit to lead
  • loss of reputation on failure
  • opportunity costs

Sexual Selection of Leadership #

  • males: leadership status predicts reproductive success
  • females: desire leadership positions that improve child survival

sexual selection influences cultural transmission but does not determine or justify behavior

Five implications of policy #

  1. encouragement of women to act like men is ineffective

    • different goals
    • more democratic leadership in women
  2. call attention to poor male strategy

    • self promotion, overconfidence, exaggerating competence
    • large social networks with weak ties
    • toxic competitive practice
  3. emphasize other motivations for leadership

    • prestige over power of norms, dominance
    • institutional requirements for gender diversity
  4. make work compatible with childcare

    • remove gendered labor
    • increase paternity leave (reduced testosterone → change behaviors)
  5. diversify leadership styles

    • some situations need covert, empathetic competition
    • prioritization of healthcare, welfare, education (success of offspring)

Competition Differences Between Sexes #

WEIRD Men: #

  • fast, large scale coalition building
  • larger group socializing
  • hierarchies
  • respect competitiveness
  • structure to compete against other groups of men

WEIRD Women: #

  • Competition modes are low injury risk
    • indirect aggression: gossip, social exclusion
  • Seek stable sources of social support
  • levelling mechanism to counter aggressive individuals
  • egalitarian small networks
    • less political influence (smaller, closer alliances)

Competitive Styles #

  • men: contest competition (public, zero-sum, rituals)
  • women: scramble competition (everyone competes against themselves, adaptive to alloparenting)

Leadership #

  • followers prefer physically dominant leaders over prestige-based traits

The Precarious Manhood Belief #

  • manhood is hard to earn, easy to lose, must be proven repeatedly by action
    • more prevalent in less developed countries: less material wealth ⇒ more relational wealth
    • correlated w/ gender inequality
    • fear of paternity uncertainty ⇒ high homicide rate of intimate partners

In typical polygynous mammals: #

  • males “run for office” by visiting fertile females in her territory
    • evidence for episodic memory
    • compete w/ other males to see who can navigate most accurately
  • females choose males based on familiarity
    • good genes: offspring will have good spatial ability

→ polygynous males have better maze solving ability → no diff. in monogamous (territories overlap)

  • Sex differences in space use predict hippocampus differences

males → females → food (low res map of large space) (high res map of small space)

In humans: #

  • males are better at mental object rotation
    • recognition of distant landmarks
  • females are better at relative object position memory
    • track locations of food plants
    • more valuable foods are remembered more (SB farmers market experiment)

Twe Tribe (Namibia): #

  • both sexes forage, men take longer trips to find honey
  • men visit other camps more (politics, mating, alliances) → foraging for mating opportunities
  • result: men outperformed women in all memory tasks
    • WEIRD female advantage not present

Yucatec Maya: #

  • highly monogamous
  • sex difference in mobility only exists after marriage because men increase travel, travel alone

Tsimane Tribe: (Bolivia) #

Gender differences in distance traveled

  • childhood, after marriage: no difference
  • adolescence: males travel further to find mates
    • overall, no difference found in spatial cognition
    • richer, more schooling → better mental rotation, poorer pointing accuracy

Mobility is a signal of status in historical societies #

  • wealthy restricted mobility w/ heels to show they didn’t need to walk
  • foot binding → increases

Human: